Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-05-04 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-05-04 House Journal Page 4347 HB 414 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 414 An Act requiring conciliation panel review in a civil action against an architect, engineer, or land surveyor; and providing for an effective date. with the: Journal Page L&C RPT CS(L&C) NT 4NR 3023 ZERO FISCAL NOTE (DCED) 3023 JUD RPT CS(JUD) NT 4DP 1NR 1AM 3836 ZERO FISCAL NOTE (DCED) 3/8/96 3837 FIN REFERRAL ADDED 4214 FIN REFERRAL WAIVED 4281 Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 414(JUD) An Act requiring mediation in a civil action against an architect, engineer, or land surveyor; amending Rule 100, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective date. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Navarre rose to a point of order regarding debate. The Speaker stated that the point was well taken. Representative Brown declared a conflict of interest. Representative Brown placed a call of the House and lifted the call. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB414(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. 1996-05-04 House Journal Page 4348 HB 414 Representative Navarre objected and withdrew the objection. There being no further objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 414(JUD) was read the third time. The question being: Shall CSHB 414(JUD) pass the House? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 414(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Long, Mackie, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Absent: Davies, Kubina, Moses And so, CSHB 414(JUD) passed the House. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Brown gave notice of reconsideration of her vote on CSHB 414(JUD).